| Pages: [1] |
1. Crimson Harvest Skins wtf? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Daemun Khanid wrote: Shae Tadaruwa wrote: They are available for a limited time in the NES: https://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/eve-online-news/new-ship-skins-available-crimson-harvest-yc-118/ Yea.... 4 of them are. The ...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2016.10.21 13:06:00
|
2. Make Concord Consistent - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Caco De'mon wrote: I think if you want to address this issue, you need to look at more fundamental changes. Like perhaps taking CONCORD out of the equation, and making security a player-run option, You pay someone (CODE say, or ~waffe) a...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2016.07.30 17:39:27
|
3. Has there been a glitch today (17/05/16) ? - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Logged on yesterday; did some missioning, including redividing my drones. Noted today, c. 1600 UCT, that the launcher reported OFFLINE . Just gone on again, to find my drones jumbled and the new division nowhere. Was there a roll-back ? Have I l...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2016.05.17 19:36:58
|
4. Private Insurance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
BY all means set something up where the operator will consistently lose ISK. Whoever runs this is asking for bankruptcy. And "private insurance" already exists -- it's called ransom. When someone threatens to blow your ship up, you pay them not t...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2016.04.19 07:22:33
|
5. Non removal of planetary bombardment - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cixi wrote: So you don't want risk free isk machines but risk free killmails are fine ? Of course :: the free isk machines belong to CareBears; the killmails would belong the Real Men(TM) [Set Sarcasm Off]
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2016.02.07 16:12:41
|
6. Reasons for/against WiS (Discussion) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hijacking thread here :: Since it is agreed that WiS is dead , may I ask if there is anyone (apart from trolls) who can find merit in its first iteration, CQ. Does this add anything to EvE ? I can't myself, think of anything, and I think...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2015.06.10 08:58:52
|
7. Care bear capitals too protected? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Urziel99 wrote: If someone is dumb enough to lose a capital ship, then by all means do so. But don't come crying for free kills when they take steps to defend themselves. RTFT
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2015.06.09 18:29:29
|
8. Care bear capitals too protected? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Urziel99 wrote: Ragnar Rancidbreeks wrote: Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Still waiting for you to explain why PVE players should get risk-free links compared to PVP players who today do not, without quoting 'coding is hard' crap from CCP....
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2015.06.09 18:28:17
|
9. Care bear capitals too protected? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: Still waiting for you to explain why PVE players should get risk-free links compared to PVP players who today do not, without quoting 'coding is hard' crap from CCP. Stiiiiiill waiting. F Probably because CCP...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2015.06.09 17:08:56
|
10. Care bear capitals too protected? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
2 questions, If I may (which i can't see have been answered above) 1) Why are * carebears * being allowed access to capital ships ? They have no need of the, since they just pootle about the universe, existing to get shot at ? 2) Why is any ...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2015.06.09 16:33:51
|
11. Announcement:Carnyx release - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Panterata wrote: Yea...please make EVE Online for Noobies game separate from EVE Online. +2 so long as they get *no* loot, *no* salvage, and must pay 2x tax to their corp until they declare themselves not noobs any more. Oh, and are crim-...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2015.06.03 20:03:05
|
12. What is this Gnosis you speak of - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chribba wrote: It's a lovely SoCT battlecruiser that every active account will be given soon. /c And out of which a *lot* of carebears (like me) will be blown as soon as they venture out in it. It's a chance for (semi-)unique killmails, an...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2013.05.05 15:40:00
|
13. Walking around in station is it dead? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's dead. In total, because A) It wastes time developing it B) It wastes bandwidth when it's enabled C) It gives carebears like me something to do that isn't flyting internet spacehips being blown up by PvP vets d) It was never meant to b...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2013.05.03 14:08:00
|
14. How to improve the gnosis - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Surely the answer to " unique & therefore not going to be flown " and " but we'd like a supply of them " is for evcery account to get one on a date, immediately thereafter hold a Gnos-ageddon contest, and give the one-and-only BPO to the perso...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2013.02.01 14:54:00
|
15. Is the galaxy ever going to get bigger? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't advocate it and I don't want it to happen, but one way to simulate empty space and the loneliness would be simply to abolish hi-sec and lo-sec, make the whole pace 0.0, and while you're at it do away with all the NPC stations and corps and...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2010.09.03 16:18:00
|
16. Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Seriously (and it already happens on one of the career training paths), why not get the noobs over losing ships by making the last mission before leaving your starting station one which utterly destroys your first ship -- then tell them to travsl ...
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2010.08.28 08:01:00
|
17. Tech 3 Industrial Cruiser - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Looks / sounds an interesting concept Plus it would give the pirate corps a T3 ship they could hunt in hi-sec that wouldn't be too hard a fight and might well be carrying valuable modules and cargo.
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2010.08.01 19:34:00
|
18. R.A.G.E Stomp EVE Engineering - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
What I believe is called a kicking. nice work -- esp from a WildCard slot
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2010.06.06 15:17:00
|
19. ♥ Hydra - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
It's gamesmanship -- winning the meta-game even if you lose the immediate aspect. If *you* were the general facing those guys, could you honestly say you'd know what their battle-plan was ?
- by Ragnar Rancidbreeks - at 2010.06.05 16:16:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |